|
Greetings!
Welcome to The Source, the e-newsletter from
Results
Through Training, Inc. Our goal is to provide
trainers
and
consultants with activities and tools they can
use in
their training sessions and adapt to their specific
training needs. Tell us what you think, what
you used,
and what you wish we would include in our next
newsletter. Send us a quick message at
staff@RTTWorks.com or visit our web site at
RTTWorks.com.
| Exercise: Telephone Game - In Charades |
 |
This exercise is a fun way to illustrate how messages
get lost or misunderstood. Divide the group into two
teams. Each team should be about 7-10 people. If
you have a large group, you can create three teams.
Tell each group that they must come up with a
scenario for the other team to act out. It can be
anything that can be acted in less than one minute.
Have the first team line up all facing the same
direction, each looking at the back of another person's
head. Give the person at the back of the line the
scenario to act out (from the other team). That
person taps the shoulder of the person in front of her
(who then turns around) and acts out the scenario.
Then that person taps the shoulder of the next person
and acts out what she just saw, and so on until the
end of the line. The last person in the line has to try
to guess what the scenario was. Then have the next
team follow the same instructions.
In your debrief, discuss how different the final guess
was from the original scenario. Ask how it happened.
Make a comparison to how our view of a situation
sometimes gets twisted when we hear information
second (or third) hand. Discuss how we sometimes
completely misinterpret something even when we get
the information directly.
This activity can be used for communication skills
(listening, explaining), supervisory skills or problem
solving (investigating situations before drawing
conclusions), and conflict management (recognizing
when we don't correctly interpret another person's
message). And because it's non-verbal, you can make
the point that how we say something often has as
much or more impact than what we say. Best of all,
it's lots of fun to see how the scenario changes down
the line!
|
| Exercise: The Black Box |
 |
This exercise is from my old high school science
teacher. Mr. Large would bring in a black box and we
would try to guess what was in it. I can't remember
the point of the activity at the time, but I do have
some ideas about how it can be used in today's
business training.
You will need a box about the size of a cigar box. Find
an everyday object or a company product, something
that most people would be likely to recognize. It
should be small enough to put in the box and move
around freely. Place it in the box and tape the box
closed with black tape so that it isn't easily opened.
Divide the group into small teams of 2-3. Give each
team an opportunity to hold the box and guess what's
inside. Have them write down what they know about
the object along with their guess. After all teams have
shared their guesses and the characteristics of the
object, tell them what it is. (You don't actually have to
open the box.)
This activity can be used to discuss how we gather
information, how comfortable we are when we don't
have all the information we want, and how we work
with others to analyze information. If you add the time
element (you must record your guess within 1 minute of
holding the box), that can lead to a discussion of how
we may draw the wrong conclusion because of time
pressure. So many possibilities - thanks to an old
science memory from long ago. Thanks Mr. Large!
|
| Exercise: Building Blocks |
 |
This exercise helps illustrate how hard it is to give good
direction. It can be used for delegation training,
management or supervisory skills, or any general
communication workshop. You will need two sets of
wooden blocks (or other building toys). Divide the
group into two teams. One team will be the Builder,
the other will be the Imitator. Have the Imitator Team
select one person to observe the Builder Team. The
remainder of the Imitator Team must have their backs
to the Builder Team at all times.
Instruct the Builder Team to create a structure with
their blocks. The Observer from the Imitator Team
must watch the Builder Team as they create. When
the structure is finished, the Observer must instruct his
team to recreate the same structure. However, the
Observer may not look at his team while they follow the
instructions given. They can ask questions of each
other, but may not look at each other.
Debreif by discussing how difficult it can be to follow
instructions without face-to-face communication, how
hard it is to give clear direction, how important good
questions are to full understanding of a task, or other
points that fit your training objectives.
Tip: You may want to limit the number of blocks used
or the amount of time to recreate the structure so that
the lesson is learned with the most efficient use of
time.
|
| Defining Training Objectives |
 |
One of our challenges as training designers is learning
the objectives for the training. That is, finding out
what the customer (internal or external) is really trying
to accomplish. Granted, sometimes they just want a
check mark to say that they took action. But in
reality, something isn't working right and needs to be
fixed. And they are coming to us to fix it. If we don't
know the true problem, we might not provide the right
solution. And if we and the customer don't understand
the cost of the problem, we might not be able to justify
the cost of the right solution.
We can add value to the organization by consulting
with the customer to uncover the root cause of a
problem, quantify that cost, and then measure the
results to confirm that a return on investment has been
realized. The most important skill needed to make this
happen is questioning. Good questions help the
customer define the problem, quantify it, and estimate
the potential return.
Here are some good questions to try the next time
you've been assigned a training initiative: What would
you like to accomplish? How do you know there's a
problem? Why is this important now? How often is
that happening? How many people do that? Let's
assume that you have star performers, underachievers,
and average performers. How many people fit into
each group? What differentiates a star from an
average performer? What is the cost to your
department, in dollars, people, time, opportunity, etc.?
How would it help if things were different? How do you
measure that? What is it now? What do you think it
could be if we are successful with the training?
I encourage you to ask a lot of questions. You aren't
prying - you are trying to do your job and add value to
the process. And if you establish quantifiable measures
for training results, you will be building credibility for
you and your training organization. There are some
great books available if you want to explore training
measurement. Or attend a training class or
measurement session at your next training conference.
Expand your own skills in this area and make even more
of a difference with the work you do.
|
|
|
 |
|
.
|
|