|
Greetings!
Welcome to The Source, the e-newsletter from
Results
Through Training, Inc. Our goal is to provide
trainers
and
consultants with activities and tools they can
use in
their training sessions and adapt to their specific
training needs. Tell us what you think, what
you used,
and what you wish we would include in our next
newsletter. Send us a quick message at
staff@RTTWorks.com or visit our web site at
RTTWorks.com.
| Activity: Presentation Style |
 |
Presentation skills are often difficult to master. People
see others who are great presenters and think, "I can
never be that good." One point I make when teaching
presentation skills is the importance of developing your
own personal style, one that reflects your personality.
The goal of this activity is to help participants realize
that there are many different presentation styles, and
any one of them can be effective.
Divide the group into 4-5 small teams. Give each team
the same assignment: develop a short presentation on
how to make a good presentation. Assign each team a
different presentation style to use when developing and
delivering their presentation. The styles we assign
are: Evangelical, Folksy, Quiet, Casual/Familiar,
Professorial, and Formal/Reserved. Allow them 15
minutes to prepare the presentation.
Have teams present (suggest that they choose a team
member who can best play their assigned style). After
each presentation, have the other teams guess what
style was being demonstrated and what clues they
observed that illustrated that style.
Summarize by making the point that there are many
presentation styles to choose from. To be a great
presenter, you must find the right style for your
personality. Then have them identify their preferred
style and begin to incorporate elements of that style
throughout the presentations they give during training.
Visit our web site at
www.rttworks.com/Free_Resources for free
downloads of the handouts we use in this activity.
|
| Activity: Best/Worst Case Scenario |
 |
This activity helps people see how their mind impacts
their ability to deal with difficult situations. Prepare by
identifying 4-5 typical conflict situations for your
group. For example, the boss criticizes you in front of
others; a direct report missed an important deadline
without warning you; an angry customer is berating you
for something you have no control over. Write out the
scenarios in short paragraphs, focusing on specific and
observable behaviors. Avoid describing people's
motivations.
In the session, distribute the scenarios to the group.
Divide the class into pairs or trios. Assign each
scenario to at least 2 teams. Instruct half the teams
for a given scenario to develop a "best case" analysis
of the situation, and the other half a "worst case"
analysis to explain the situation. Ask them to get
creative with their ideas, including both logical
explanations and really wild ones. Allow 5 minutes.
Then have teams share their work.
Debrief with questions like: How easy was it to develop
the best case? The worst case? If one is easier for
you, why is that? How might you approach a situation
if you assumed the best case? The worst case? When
do you tend toward the best? Toward the worst? How
can you apply this insight to the conflicts you face?
If time allows, you can have them identify a real
conflict of their own and develop a best/worst case
scenario, along with plans to explore the real
explanation. When they get back on the job, if they
begin to consider the best and worst cases, it will slow
them down, which is a smart move when facing a
confrontation.
|
| Activity: Arm Wrestling |
 |
I heard this activity described in a book called Beyond
Reason by Roger Fisher and Daniel Shapiro (of the
Harvard Negotiation Project). It's a great way to
illustrate the difference between negotiating with a
fixed-pie approach and negotiating by making the pie
bigger. In a typical negotiation, if the two parties see
one side's gain as another's loss, that's a fixed-pie
approach (there's one pie, and it's this big). If, on the
other hand, they work together to find a way to make
the pie bigger, they can achieve better results for all.
This activity illustrates that concept.
Divide the class into pairs. Instruct the pairs to face
each other, place their elbows on the table, and clasp
their partner's right hand. Tell them that the goal of
this exercise is to get the most points possible as an
individual, and not to worry about the number of points
their partner gets. A point is earned each time your
partner's hand touches the table.
What will happen in most pairs is that they will compete
with their partners (even though you tell them they
shouldn't worry about their partner's points). But you
may have one pair that realizes if they allow their
partner to make points, their partner will probably
reciprocate, and both will make many more points than
the other teams.
Debrief by asking who got the most points. Then ask
about their approach to the exercise: Did they work
with their partner or see him/her as competition? What
were the instructions to the exercise (do they
remember)? How does this illustrate the way they
typically approach a negotiation? Then lead into a
discussion of the fixed pie vs. bigger pie approach.
|
| Theme Idea: Road Signs |
 |
I'm always looking for creative ways to illustrate our
training manuals. After all, the information is important,
and if it's presented well visually, it can help people
learn. While on a recent road trip, I had an "Aha!"
moment in this area. I was noticing the different road
signs (as a good driver should do) and thought about
how they exist to guide travelers. Then I thought,
that's exactly what's needed in a training manual: road
signs to guide learning.
So I began to brainstorm how to incorporate road signs
into a training manual, and here's what I came up with.
Street signs = Page titles. Mile markers = Page
numbers. Overhead signs on interstate = Tab pages OR
Welcome to our state signs = tab pages. Slow, Hazard
signs (curves, bump, etc.) or speed limit signs =
warning about difficult activity. Stop Sign = before a
test. Fork in the Road = Action Plan.
You can also create graphical road maps illustrating the
course content and flow, and copy these for each
person. We enlarge to 11x17 and provide markers for
people to color in the road maps during the class. (You
can find a sample course map on our web site at
www.rttworks.com/Free_Resources.)
I'm sure there are many more ways to build this theme
into the class. Let your imagination go wild and have
some fun - for you and the learners.
|
|
|